Microservices Architecture: When to Use and When to Avoid
BackendNovember 26, 202520 min read1 views
MicroservicesArchitectureBackendDevOpsSystem DesignScalability
Share:
Microservices Architecture: When to Use and When to Avoid
Microservices are everywhere, but are they right for your project? Let's explore the architecture, patterns, and real-world considerations.
What Are Microservices?
Microservices architecture breaks down applications into small, independent services that:
- Run in their own process
- Communicate via APIs (HTTP, gRPC, message queues)
- Can be deployed independently
- Are organized around business capabilities
Monolith vs Microservices
Monolithic Architecture
┌─────────────────────────────┐
│ Single Application │
│ ┌─────────────────────┐ │
│ │ User Management │ │
│ ├─────────────────────┤ │
│ │ Order Processing │ │
│ ├─────────────────────┤ │
│ │ Payment Processing │ │
│ ├─────────────────────┤ │
│ │ Inventory │ │
│ └─────────────────────┘ │
│ Single Database │
└─────────────────────────────┘
Pros:
- ✅ Simple to develop
- ✅ Easy to test
- ✅ Simple deployment
- ✅ No network overhead
Cons:
- ❌ Tight coupling
- ❌ Difficult to scale
- ❌ Technology lock-in
- ❌ Large codebase
Microservices Architecture
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ User │ │ Order │ │ Payment │
│ Service │ │ Service │ │ Service │
│ ┌────────┐ │ │ ┌────────┐ │ │ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ DB │ │ │ │ DB │ │ │ │ DB │ │
│ └────────┘ │ │ └────────┘ │ │ └────────┘ │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
│ │ │
└─────────────────┴──────────────────┘
API Gateway
Pros:
- ✅ Independent deployment
- ✅ Technology flexibility
- ✅ Easy to scale
- ✅ Fault isolation
Cons:
- ❌ Complex infrastructure
- ❌ Network latency
- ❌ Data consistency challenges
- ❌ Testing complexity
Microservices Patterns
1. API Gateway Pattern
Loading code...
2. Service Discovery Pattern
Loading code...
3. Circuit Breaker Pattern
Loading code...
4. Event-Driven Architecture
Loading code...
5. Saga Pattern (Distributed Transactions)
Loading code...
Database Strategies
Database per Service
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│User Service │ │Order Service │
│ ┌────────┐ │ │ ┌────────┐ │
│ │ Users │ │ │ │ Orders │ │
│ │ DB │ │ │ │ DB │ │
│ └────────┘ │ │ └────────┘ │
└──────────────┘ └──────────────┘
Pros:
- ✅ Loose coupling
- ✅ Independent scaling
Cons:
- ❌ No ACID transactions
- ❌ Data duplication
Shared Database (Anti-pattern)
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│User Service │ │Order Service │
└──────┬───────┘ └──────┬───────┘
│ │
└────────┬───────────┘
│
┌──────▼──────┐
│ Shared │
│ Database │
└─────────────┘
Why avoid?
- ❌ Tight coupling
- ❌ Schema changes affect all services
- ❌ Defeats microservices purpose
Communication Patterns
Synchronous (REST/gRPC)
Loading code...
Asynchronous (Message Queue)
Loading code...
Deployment Strategies
Docker Compose (Development)
Loading code...
Kubernetes (Production)
Loading code...
When to Use Microservices
✅ Use when:
- Large, complex application
- Multiple independent teams
- Different scaling requirements per feature
- Need for technology diversity
- High availability requirements
❌ Avoid when:
- Small application or startup
- Small team (< 5 developers)
- Tight deadlines
- Limited DevOps expertise
- Simple CRUD application
Migration Strategy
Strangler Fig Pattern
Phase 1: Monolith
┌─────────────────┐
│ Monolith │
└─────────────────┘
Phase 2: Extract first service
┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Monolith │ │ User │
│ (minus │ │ Service │
│ users) │ └──────────┘
└─────────────┘
Phase 3: Extract more services
┌─────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌─────────┐
│Monolith │ │ User │ │ Order │
│ (core) │ │Service │ │ Service │
└─────────┘ └────────┘ └─────────┘
Conclusion
Microservices aren't a silver bullet:
- Start simple with monolith
- Extract services when needed
- Use proven patterns (API Gateway, Circuit Breaker, Saga)
- Invest in DevOps (CI/CD, monitoring, logging)
- Plan for failure (resilience, fallbacks)
Remember: Complexity is a feature, not a bug. Only add it when you need it! 🎯